[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Ve9-659N5N=f7pPb-9amvbGbi+zWxL9p-BnYocvXJPwZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 20:35:00 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Frederick Lawler <fred@...dlawl.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@...wei.com>,
Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] PCI/PME: Replace dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG) with dev_info()
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 5:18 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote:
> Replace dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG) with dev_info() or dev_err() to be more
> consistent with other logging.
>
> These could be converted to dev_dbg(), but that depends on
> CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG and DEBUG, and we want most of these messages to
> *always* be in the dmesg log.
>
> Also, use dev_fmt() to add the service name. Example output change:
>
> - pcieport 0000:80:10.0: Signaling PME with IRQ ...
> + pcieport 0000:80:10.0: PME: Signaling with IRQ ...
> + pci_info(port, "interrupt generated for non-existent device %02x:%02x.%d\n",
Can we be slightly more consistent here, i.e. start from Capital letter?
> + busnr, PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn));
> + pci_info(port, "Spurious native interrupt!\n");
> + pci_info(port, "Signaling with IRQ %d\n", srv->irq);
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists