[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <69ff0a66d8c68f9e1adc8308847541e9566fe23e.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 11:31:04 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Frederick Lawler <fred@...dlawl.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@...wei.com>,
Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] PCI/PME: Replace dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG) with
dev_info()
On Thu, 2019-05-09 at 20:35 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 5:18 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Replace dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG) with dev_info() or dev_err() to be more
> > consistent with other logging.
> >
> > These could be converted to dev_dbg(), but that depends on
> > CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG and DEBUG, and we want most of these messages to
> > *always* be in the dmesg log.
> >
> > Also, use dev_fmt() to add the service name. Example output change:
> >
> > - pcieport 0000:80:10.0: Signaling PME with IRQ ...
> > + pcieport 0000:80:10.0: PME: Signaling with IRQ ...
> > + pci_info(port, "interrupt generated for non-existent device %02x:%02x.%d\n",
>
> Can we be slightly more consistent here, i.e. start from Capital letter?
>
> > + busnr, PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn));
> > + pci_info(port, "Spurious native interrupt!\n");
> > + pci_info(port, "Signaling with IRQ %d\n", srv->irq);
Why change the logging level?
Why not use #define DEBUG and use pci_dbg ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists