lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190509184234.GA197434@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 May 2019 12:42:34 -0600
From:   Raul Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, djkurtz@...gle.com,
        adrian.hunter@...el.com, zwisler@...omium.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: v4.14: Fix null pointer dereference in
 mmc_init_request

On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 11:04:56PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 12:58:32PM -0600, Raul E Rangel wrote:
> > It is possible for queuedata to be cleared in mmc_cleanup_queue before
> > the request has been started.
> 
> Errm.  I think we need to fix that problem instead of working around it.
So mmc_request_fn already has a null check, it was just missing on
mmc_init_request.

I could move `blk_cleanup_queue(q)` above `q->queuedata = NULL` and the
lock. So that would mean cherry-picking
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/856512/ and then a patch with
moving blk_cleanup_queue.

Should I do that instead?

Thanks,
Raul

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ