[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MdsA7A1DdS1ZJ8NS8xtuCjgc_7WZD1797H3oZ=2w+fOBA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 11:16:51 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: anton ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 4/4] um: irq: don't set the chip for all irqs
śr., 8 maj 2019 o 09:13 Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> napisał(a):
>
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >> Can you please check?
> >> This patch is already queued in -next. So we need to decide whether to
> >> revert or fix it now.
> >>
> > I am looking at it. It passed tests in my case (I did the usual round).
>
> It works here too. That's why I never noticed.
> Yesterday I noticed just because I looked for something else in the kernel logs.
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
Hi,
sorry for the late reply - I just came back from vacation.
I see it here too, I'll check if I can find the culprit and fix it today.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists