lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190510103318.6cieoifz27eph4n5@linutronix.de>
Date:   Fri, 10 May 2019 12:33:18 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     minyard@....org
Cc:     linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT v2] Fix a lockup in wait_for_completion() and friends

On 2019-05-09 14:33:20 [-0500], minyard@....org wrote:
> From: Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>
> 
> The function call do_wait_for_common() has a race condition that
> can result in lockups waiting for completions.  Adding the thread
> to (and removing the thread from) the wait queue for the completion
> is done outside the do loop in that function.  However, if the thread
> is woken up, the swake_up_locked() function will delete the entry
> from the wait queue.  If that happens and another thread sneaks
> in and decrements the done count in the completion to zero, the
> loop will go around again, but the thread will no longer be in the
> wait queue, so there is no way to wake it up.

applied, thank you.

Sebastian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ