[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e496aece-b092-7845-9295-25b764721724@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 13:53:26 +0100
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>
To: Oleksandr <olekstysh@...il.com>, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: horms@...ge.net.au, magnus.damm@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
biju.das@...renesas.com,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@...m.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ARM: mach-shmobile: Don't init CNTVOFF if PSCI is
available
On 10/05/2019 13:27, Oleksandr wrote:
>
> On 06.05.19 18:37, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi Oleksandr,
>
> Hi Julien
>
>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-rcar-gen2.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-rcar-gen2.c
>>> b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-rcar-gen2.c
>>> index eea60b2..bc8537b 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-rcar-gen2.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-rcar-gen2.c
>>> @@ -17,7 +17,9 @@
>>> #include <linux/of.h>
>>> #include <linux/of_fdt.h>
>>> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>>> +#include <xen/xen.h>
>>> #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
>>> +#include <asm/psci.h>
>>> #include <asm/secure_cntvoff.h>
>>> #include "common.h"
>>> #include "rcar-gen2.h"
>>> @@ -63,7 +65,16 @@ void __init rcar_gen2_timer_init(void)
>>> void __iomem *base;
>>> u32 freq;
>>> - secure_cntvoff_init();
>>> + /*
>>> + * If PSCI is available then most likely we are running on PSCI-enabled
>>> + * U-Boot which, we assume, has already taken care of resetting CNTVOFF
>>> + * before switching to non-secure mode and we don't need to.
>>> + * Another check is to be sure that we are not running on top of Xen
>>> + * hypervisor, as CNTVOFF is controlled by hypervisor itself and
>>> + * shouldn't be touched by Dom0 in such case.
>>
>> If you are running on top of Xen, then PSCI will be available. So is there any
>> real value to check the presence of Xen as well?
>
> I think, no. If the PSCI is a must to run Xen, then it is certainly an excessive
> check. I will drop it in V3.
Xen does not offer another interface for SMP bring-up.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
Powered by blists - more mailing lists