[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190510135234.GF9675@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 07:52:34 -0600
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
Mario Limonciello <Mario.Limonciello@...l.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-nvme <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Busch, Keith" <keith.busch@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: Use non-operational power state instead of D3
on Suspend-to-Idle
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 01:23:11AM -0700, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 8:08 AM Kai-Heng Feng
> > I tested the patch from Keith and it has two issues just as simply skipping
> > nvme_dev_disable():
> > 1) It consumes more power in S2I
> > 2) System freeze after resume
>
> Well, the Keith's patch doesn't prevent pci_pm_suspend_noirq() from
> asking for D3 and both of the symptoms above may be consequences of
> that in principle.
Right, I'll fix up the kernel's PCI D3 control and resend for
consideration.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists