[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190510153647.GB21421@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 17:36:47 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Cc: jannh@...gle.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arnd@...db.de, arunks@...eaurora.org,
cyphar@...har.com, dhowells@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
elena.reshetova@...el.com, guro@...com, keescook@...omium.org,
luto@...capital.net, luto@...nel.org, mhocko@...e.com,
mingo@...nel.org, mtk.manpages@...il.com, namit@...are.com,
peterz@...radead.org, riel@...riel.com, shakeelb@...gle.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
wad@...omium.org,
syzbot+3286e58549edc479faae@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fork: do not release lock that wasn't taken
On 05/10, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> @@ -2102,7 +2102,7 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
> */
> retval = cgroup_can_fork(p);
> if (retval)
> - goto bad_fork_put_pidfd;
> + goto bad_fork_cgroup_threadgroup_change_end;
>
> /*
> * From this point on we must avoid any synchronous user-space
> @@ -2217,11 +2217,12 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
> spin_unlock(¤t->sighand->siglock);
> write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> cgroup_cancel_fork(p);
> +bad_fork_cgroup_threadgroup_change_end:
> + cgroup_threadgroup_change_end(current);
> bad_fork_put_pidfd:
> if (clone_flags & CLONE_PIDFD)
> ksys_close(pidfd);
> bad_fork_free_pid:
> - cgroup_threadgroup_change_end(current);
> if (pid != &init_struct_pid)
> free_pid(pid);
> bad_fork_cleanup_thread:
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists