| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190511190415.GA22816@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 12:04:18 -0700
From: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
Avi Fishman <avifishman70@...il.com>,
Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@...il.com>,
Tali Perry <tali.perry1@...il.com>,
Patrick Venture <venture@...gle.com>,
Nancy Yuen <yuenn@...gle.com>,
Benjamin Fair <benjaminfair@...gle.com>,
Kamil Debski <kamil@...as.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] thermal: Introduce
devm_thermal_of_cooling_device_register
Hello Guenter,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:58:15PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> thermal_of_cooling_device_register() and thermal_cooling_device_register()
> are typically called from driver probe functions, and
> thermal_cooling_device_unregister() is called from remove functions. This
> makes both a perfect candidate for device managed functions.
>
> Introduce devm_thermal_of_cooling_device_register(). This function can
> also be used to replace thermal_cooling_device_register() by passing a NULL
> pointer as device node. The new function requires both struct device *
> and struct device_node * as parameters since the struct device_node *
> parameter is not always identical to dev->of_node.
>
> Don't introduce a device managed remove function since it is not needed
> at this point.
I don't have any objection on adding this API. Only a minor thing below:
>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/thermal.h | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> index 6590bb5cb688..e0b530603db6 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> @@ -1046,6 +1046,55 @@ thermal_of_cooling_device_register(struct device_node *np,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(thermal_of_cooling_device_register);
>
> +static void thermal_cooling_device_release(struct device *dev, void *res)
> +{
> + thermal_cooling_device_unregister(
> + *(struct thermal_cooling_device **)res);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * devm_thermal_of_cooling_device_register() - register an OF thermal cooling
> + * device
> + * @dev: a valid struct device pointer of a sensor device.
> + * @np: a pointer to a device tree node.
> + * @type: the thermal cooling device type.
> + * @devdata: device private data.
> + * @ops: standard thermal cooling devices callbacks.
> + *
> + * This function will register a cooling device with device tree node reference.
> + * This interface function adds a new thermal cooling device (fan/processor/...)
> + * to /sys/class/thermal/ folder as cooling_device[0-*]. It tries to bind itself
> + * to all the thermal zone devices registered at the same time.
> + *
> + * Return: a pointer to the created struct thermal_cooling_device or an
> + * ERR_PTR. Caller must check return value with IS_ERR*() helpers.
> + */
> +struct thermal_cooling_device *
> +devm_thermal_of_cooling_device_register(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_node *np,
> + char *type, void *devdata,
> + const struct thermal_cooling_device_ops *ops)
> +{
> + struct thermal_cooling_device **ptr, *tcd;
> +
> + ptr = devres_alloc(thermal_cooling_device_release, sizeof(*ptr),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ptr)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + tcd = __thermal_cooling_device_register(np, type, devdata, ops);
> + if (IS_ERR(tcd)) {
> + devres_free(ptr);
> + return tcd;
> + }
> +
> + *ptr = tcd;
> + devres_add(dev, ptr);
> +
> + return tcd;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_thermal_of_cooling_device_register);
> +
> static void __unbind(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int mask,
> struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
> {
> diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h
> index 5f4705f46c2f..43cf4fdd71d4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/thermal.h
> +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
> @@ -447,6 +447,11 @@ struct thermal_cooling_device *thermal_cooling_device_register(char *, void *,
> struct thermal_cooling_device *
> thermal_of_cooling_device_register(struct device_node *np, char *, void *,
> const struct thermal_cooling_device_ops *);
> +struct thermal_cooling_device *
> +devm_thermal_of_cooling_device_register(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_node *np,
> + char *type, void *devdata,
> + const struct thermal_cooling_device_ops *ops);
We need to stub this in case thermal is not selected.
> void thermal_cooling_device_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *);
> struct thermal_zone_device *thermal_zone_get_zone_by_name(const char *name);
> int thermal_zone_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int *temp);
Something like:
diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h
index 43cf4fd..9b1b365 100644
--- a/include/linux/thermal.h
+++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
@@ -508,6 +508,14 @@ static inline struct thermal_cooling_device *
thermal_of_cooling_device_register(struct device_node *np,
char *type, void *devdata, const struct thermal_cooling_device_ops *ops)
{ return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); }
+struct thermal_cooling_device *
+devm_thermal_of_cooling_device_register(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_node *np,
+ char *type, void *devdata,
+ const struct thermal_cooling_device_ops *ops)
+{
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+}
static inline void thermal_cooling_device_unregister(
struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
{ }
~
If you want I can amend this to your patch and apply it.
Also, do you prefer me to collect only this patch and you would collect hwmon changes,
or are you ok if I collect all the series?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists