[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190511060203.GA18650@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 08:02:03 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@...labora.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
atish patra <atishp04@...il.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Brendan Gregg <bgregg@...flix.com>,
Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@...il.com>,
Daniel Colascione <dancol@...gle.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
duyuchao <yuchao.du@...soc.com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Karim Yaghmour <karim.yaghmour@...rsys.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Manjo Raja Rao <linux@...ojrajarao.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
MichaĆ Gregorczyk <michalgr@...com>,
Michal Gregorczyk <michalgr@...e.com>,
Mohammad Husain <russoue@...il.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Srinivas Ramana <sramana@...eaurora.org>,
Tamir Carmeli <carmeli.tamir@...il.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] kheaders: Make it depend on sysfs
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 09:52:04AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 6:05 AM Joel Fernandes (Google)
> <joel@...lfernandes.org> wrote:
> >
> > The kheaders archive is exposed through SYSFS in /sys/kernel/. Make it
> > depend on SYSFS as it makes no sense to enable this feature without it.
>
>
> And, it also makes no sense to break the feature by 1/3,
> then fix it by 3/3.
>
>
> Why don't you squash this?
I agree, this belongs in patch 1/3.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists