[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1557665567.10635.222.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 08:52:47 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, initramfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
silviu.vlasceanu@...wei.com, dmitry.kasatkin@...wei.com,
takondra@...co.com, kamensky@...co.com, hpa@...or.com,
arnd@...db.de, rob@...dley.net, james.w.mcmechan@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] initramfs: add support for xattrs in the initial
ram disk
On Sun, 2019-05-12 at 11:17 +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 01:24:17PM +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > This proposal consists in marshaling pathnames and xattrs in a file called
> > .xattr-list. They are unmarshaled by the CPIO parser after all files have
> > been extracted.
>
> Couldn't this parsing of the .xattr-list file and the setting of the xattrs
> be done equivalently by the initramfs' /init? Why is kernel involvement
> actually required here?
It's too late. The /init itself should be signed and verified.
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists