linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] spi: Allow SPI devices to specify that they are timing sensitive

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 12 May 2019 16:42:53 +0900
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
        Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, drinkcat@...omium.org,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>, briannorris@...omium.org,
        mka@...omium.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] spi: Allow SPI devices to specify that they are
 timing sensitive

On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 03:34:35PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:

> + * @timing_sensitive: Transfers for this device are senstive to timing
> + *	so we should do our transfer at high priority.

Not sure this is the best name.  Every device is timing sensitive to
some extent and it's a bit wooly about what it's trying to accomplish,
it's specifically about the timing involved in ensuring that the entire
message goes out as quickly as possible AIUI.  I think if anything I'd
just have the caller specifying a RT priority for the thread, but that's
awkward as we might want to switch over to deadline at some point.  How
about just calling the parameter rt the same as it is when the
controller does the same configuration?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)