[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190512091748.s6fvy2f5p2a2o6ja@isilmar-4.linta.de>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 11:17:48 +0200
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, initramfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
silviu.vlasceanu@...wei.com, dmitry.kasatkin@...wei.com,
takondra@...co.com, kamensky@...co.com, hpa@...or.com,
arnd@...db.de, rob@...dley.net, james.w.mcmechan@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] initramfs: add support for xattrs in the initial
ram disk
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 01:24:17PM +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> This proposal consists in marshaling pathnames and xattrs in a file called
> .xattr-list. They are unmarshaled by the CPIO parser after all files have
> been extracted.
Couldn't this parsing of the .xattr-list file and the setting of the xattrs
be done equivalently by the initramfs' /init? Why is kernel involvement
actually required here?
Thanks,
Dominik
Powered by blists - more mailing lists