[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHc6FU7WsCx4B53d5=N114A7E22A=nmXX-4Sz=uSKEsf65v3-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 00:57:24 +0200
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: cluster-devel <cluster-devel@...hat.com>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gfs2: Fix error path kobject memory leak
On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 00:47, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 3:37 PM Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, I should have been more explicit. Would you mind taking this
> > patch, please? If it's more convenient or more appropriate, I'll send
> > a pull request instead.
>
> Done.
>
> However, I'd like to point out that when I see patches from people who
> I normally get a pull request from, I usually ignore them.
>
> Particularly when they are in some thread with discussion, I'll often
> just assume that the patch is part of the thread, not really meant
> for me in particular.
>
> In this case I happened to notice that suddenly my participation
> status changed, which is why I asked, but in general I might have just
> archived the thread with the assumption that I'll be getting the patch
> later as a git pull.
>
> Just so you'll be aware of this in the future, in case I don't react...
Thanks.
Copying Jon because this looks like useful information for other
maintainers as well.
Andreas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists