[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae8a2305c5ab0d312e1334e895a5e7fdb45fbd16.camel@toradex.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 07:26:03 +0000
From: Philippe Schenker <philippe.schenker@...adex.com>
To: "jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"stefan@...er.ch" <stefan@...er.ch>,
Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>,
"David.Laight@...LAB.COM" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
Max Krummenacher <max.krummenacher@...adex.com>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"pmeerw@...erw.net" <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
"knaack.h@....de" <knaack.h@....de>,
"mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com" <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
"lars@...afoo.de" <lars@...afoo.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"alexandre.torgue@...com" <alexandre.torgue@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] iio: stmpe-adc: Reinit completion struct on begin
conversion
On Sat, 2019-05-11 at 11:08 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 7 May 2019 16:36:12 +0200
> Philippe Schenker <dev@...henker.ch> wrote:
>
> > From: Philippe Schenker <philippe.schenker@...adex.com>
> >
> > In some cases, the wait_completion got interrupted. This caused the
> > error-handling to mutex_unlock the function. The before turned on
> > interrupt then got called anyway. In the ISR then completion() was
> > called causing wrong adc-values returned in a following adc-readout.
> >
> > Reinitialise completion struct to make sure the counter is zero
> > when beginning a new adc-conversion.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Philippe Schenker <philippe.schenker@...adex.com>
> Hi Philippe,
>
> To me this looks like a fix that we should consider applying to stable.
> However, as it is in the middle of this series I'm not going to take
> it via the fast route (during rc's). If people want to backport it
> they will have to wait until after the next merge window.
> If anyone has an urgent need, then shout in the next week and I'll
> pull this version out and we can restructure the set.
>
> Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing
> for the autobuilders to play with it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
Hi Jonathan! I don't think that's necessary. As long as it gets into stable at
some point. Our customer use downstream anyway. Where I'm about to apply it now.
Thanks,
Philippe
>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/iio/adc/stmpe-adc.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stmpe-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stmpe-adc.c
> > index 9ec338ba3440..b3872eb37293 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/stmpe-adc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stmpe-adc.c
> > @@ -65,6 +65,8 @@ static int stmpe_read_voltage(struct stmpe_adc *info,
> >
> > mutex_lock(&info->lock);
> >
> > + reinit_completion(&info->completion);
> > +
> > info->channel = (u8)chan->channel;
> >
> > if (info->channel > STMPE_ADC_LAST_NR) {
> > @@ -105,6 +107,8 @@ static int stmpe_read_temp(struct stmpe_adc *info,
> >
> > mutex_lock(&info->lock);
> >
> > + reinit_completion(&info->completion);
> > +
> > info->channel = (u8)chan->channel;
> >
> > if (info->channel != STMPE_TEMP_CHANNEL) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists