[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190513102953.16424-4-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 12:29:47 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] genirq/timings: Optimize the period detection speed
If we have a minimal period and if there is a period which is a
multiple of it but lesser than the max period then it will be detected
before and the minimal period will be never reached.
1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
<-----> <-----> <----->
<-> <-> <-> <-> <-> <->
In our case, the minimum period is 2 and the maximum period is 5. That
means all repeating pattern of 2 will be detected as repeating pattern
of 4, it is pointless to go up to 2 when searching for the period as it
will always fail.
Remove one loop iteration by increasing the minimal period to 3.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
---
kernel/irq/timings.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/timings.c b/kernel/irq/timings.c
index 250bb00ccd85..06bde5253a7d 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/timings.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/timings.c
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ void irq_timings_disable(void)
#define EMA_ALPHA_VAL 64
#define EMA_ALPHA_SHIFT 7
-#define PREDICTION_PERIOD_MIN 2
+#define PREDICTION_PERIOD_MIN 3
#define PREDICTION_PERIOD_MAX 5
#define PREDICTION_FACTOR 4
#define PREDICTION_MAX 10 /* 2 ^ PREDICTION_MAX useconds */
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists