linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] mmc: meson-gx: add ddr-access-quirk support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 13 May 2019 13:28:43 +0200
From:   Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To:     Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
        khilman@...libre.com
Cc:     baylibre-upstreaming@...ups.io, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] mmc: meson-gx: add ddr-access-quirk support

On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 11:58 +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> > The performance hit hasn't been evaluated, but the fix has been tested
> > using a WiFi AP6398S SDIO module, and the iperf3 Bandwidth measurement gave
> > 55.2 Mbits/sec over a 63 Hours long test, with the SDIO ios set as High-Speed
> > at 50MHz clock. It gave around 170 Mbits/sec as SDR104 and 200MHz clock.
> 
> These numbers looks to be limited by the MMC bandwidth of the related modes.
> So, if the SRAM quirk introduce a penalty for the controller, it does not appear
> to be a limiting factor, AFAICT.

Got confused. This comment is completely wrong, please ignore