[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190513143610.GD11972@sasha-vm>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 10:36:10 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 79/95] x86/asm: Remove dead __GNUC__
conditionals
On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 08:15:03AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
>On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 07:57:01AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> On 07/05/2019 07.38, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> > From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
>> >
>> > [ Upstream commit 88ca66d8540ca26119b1428cddb96b37925bdf01 ]
>> >
>> > The minimum supported gcc version is >= 4.6, so these can be removed.
>>
>> Eh, that bump happened for the 4.19 kernel, so this is not true for the
>> 4.14 branch. Has cafa0010cd51fb711fdcb50fc55f394c5f167a0a been applied
>> to 4.14.y? Otherwise I don't think this is appropriate.
>
>No, that commit is not in 4.14, so we still have to "support" older
>versions of gcc there :(
>
>Sasha, can you drop this?
Dropped, thanks!
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists