linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nvme/pci: Use host managed power state for suspend

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190513150458.GA15437@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Mon, 13 May 2019 09:04:58 -0600
From:   Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
To:     Mario.Limonciello@...l.com
Cc:     hch@....de, keith.busch@...el.com, sagi@...mberg.me,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, rafael@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        kai.heng.feng@...onical.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme/pci: Use host managed power state for suspend

On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 03:05:42PM +0000, Mario.Limonciello@...l.com wrote:
> This system power state - suspend to idle is going to freeze threads.
> But we're talking a multi threaded kernel.  Can't there be a timing problem going
> on then too?  With a disk flush being active in one task and the other task trying
> to put the disk into the deepest power state.  If you don't freeze the queues how
> can you guarantee that didn't happen?

But if an active data flush task is running, then we're not idle and
shouldn't go to low power.