[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190513163814.GA31756@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 18:38:14 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: "Alex Xu (Hello71)" <alex_y_xu@...oo.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org, guro@...com,
kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] ptrace broken from "cgroup: cgroup v2 freezer"
(76f969e)
On 05/13, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Probably we add leave_frozen(true) after freezable_schedule() for now, then
> think try to make something better...
And again, this is what I thought ptrace_stop() does, somehow I didn't notice
that the last version doesn't have leave_frozen() in ptrace_stop().
Perhaps we can do a bit better, change only tracehook_report_syscall_entry() and
PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT/SECCOMP paths to do leave_frozen() ?
At first glance other callers look fine in that they can do nothing "interesting"
befor get_signal(), but we need to re-check...
Oleg.
> But I am not sure I 100% understand whats going on in this case, could you
> try the patch below? (Just in case, of course it is wrong).
>
> Oleg.
>
> --- x/kernel/signal.c
> +++ x/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -149,8 +149,7 @@
> {
> if ((t->jobctl & (JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK | JOBCTL_TRAP_FREEZE)) ||
> PENDING(&t->pending, &t->blocked) ||
> - PENDING(&t->signal->shared_pending, &t->blocked) ||
> - cgroup_task_frozen(t)) {
> + PENDING(&t->signal->shared_pending, &t->blocked) {
> set_tsk_thread_flag(t, TIF_SIGPENDING);
> return true;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists