linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 21/22] perf/x86/intel/uncore: renames in response to multi-die/pkg support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJvTdKnS+zAHE26NPq1KY6AfQkLd-Tyeson1-esnf+5EX9+xtg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 May 2019 13:30:42 -0400
From:   Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To:     "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/22] perf/x86/intel/uncore: renames in response to
 multi-die/pkg support

On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:02 AM Liang, Kan <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

>
> I think the "box" terminology in perf uncore has different meaning. It
> stands for an uncore PMU unit on a socket/die.
> I think it may be better use "die" to replace the "pkg".
> How about the patch as below?

Also fine with me.
And I've replaced my rename patch with yours here too.

thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center