lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 11:53:44 -0700 From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> To: Angus Ainslie <angus@...ea.ca>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com> Cc: angus.ainslie@...i.sm, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>, "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/4] MAINTAINERS: add an entry for for arm64 imx devicetrees On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 11:48 -0700, Angus Ainslie wrote: > On 2019-05-13 11:01, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 2:41 PM Angus Ainslie (Purism) <angus@...ea.ca> > > wrote: > > > Add an explicit reference to imx* devicetrees > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Angus Ainslie (Purism) <angus@...ea.ca> > > > --- > > > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > > index 7707c28628b9..0871a21a5bbb 100644 > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > > @@ -1648,6 +1648,7 @@ T: git > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shawnguo/linux.git > > > F: arch/arm/boot/dts/ls1021a* > > > F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-* > > > F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/qoriq-* > > > +F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx* > > > > No, please put this entry under ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM > > ARCHITECTURE > > > > I believe order is important. Would you like it before or after the "N:" > entries ? Or just as the last entry. Order is not important, but I prefer the N: entries after the X: and F: entries.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists