[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00dcf0be-78e2-b547-4858-c86eec576607@web.de>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 11:51:41 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@....com.cn>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Yi Wang <wang.yi59@....com.cn>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>
Subject: Re: [4/5] Coccinelle: put_device: Extend when constraints for twoSmPL
ellipses
> I did another experiment at that time and found that this modification will
> reduce the false positive rate,
Thanks for such feedback.
Will my update suggestion influence the current (or future) software situation?
> but it may also reduce the recall rate.
Would you like to explain this information a bit more?
> Could we use it to find out as many bugs as possible in the current kernel
> and then modify it?
I hope so.
* Will the false positive rate influence change acceptance considerably?
* Would you like to work with source code analysis approaches based on
adjusted confidence settings?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists