[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190514111248.vtjajwk3jvhvlqzb@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 14:12:49 +0300
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] media: v4l2-subdev: Verify arguments of
v4l2_subdev_call()
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 12:10:30PM +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> +static int check_get_fmt(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> + struct v4l2_subdev_pad_config *cfg,
> + struct v4l2_subdev_format *format)
> +{
> + return check_format(sd, format) ? :
> + sd->ops->pad->get_fmt(sd, cfg, format);
On naming --- when you're actually calling the function that does the job,
I'd call the wrapper e.g. call_something() instead. The current naming
suggests that only checks are being made.
--
Sakari Ailus
sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists