linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 v2 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: extend existing opencore bindings.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190514130113.GB5892@lunn.ch>
Date:   Tue, 14 May 2019 15:01:13 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Sagar Kadam <sagar.kadam@...ive.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, mark.rutland@....com,
        peter@...sgaard.com, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 v2 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: extend existing opencore
 bindings.

> > > +     */
> > > +     i2c@...30000 {
> > > +                     compatible = "sifive,i2c0","sifive,fu540-c000-i2c";
> > > +                     reg = <0x0 0x10030000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > > +                     reg-names = "i2c-control";
> >
> > Not doucmented.
> In v1, I had added a new binding file as sifive-i2c-ocores.txt for
> SiFive i2c core.
> After Andrew's suggestion,  extending the available i2c-ocores.txt
> seemed to be a better idea rather than adding a new file.
> so added an example node which is HiFive specific in the existing file.
> Please let me know if I need to handle this in a different way.

Hi Sagar

Is reg-names actually needed?

   Andrew