[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190514170522.GW2623@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 19:05:22 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
jan.setjeeilers@...cle.com, Liran Alon <liran.alon@...cle.com>,
Jonathan Adams <jwadams@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC KVM 18/27] kvm/isolation: function to copy page table
entries for percpu buffer
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 06:24:48PM +0200, Alexandre Chartre wrote:
> On 5/14/19 5:23 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > How important is the ability to enable IRQs while running with the KVM
> > page tables?
> >
>
> I can't say, I would need to check but we probably need IRQs at least for
> some timers. Sounds like you would really prefer IRQs to be disabled.
>
I think what amluto is getting at, is:
again:
local_irq_disable();
switch_to_kvm_mm();
/* do very little -- (A) */
VMEnter()
/* runs as guest */
/* IRQ happens */
WMExit()
/* inspect exit raisin */
if (/* IRQ pending */) {
switch_from_kvm_mm();
local_irq_restore();
goto again;
}
but I don't know anything about VMX/SVM at all, so the above might not
be feasible, specifically I read something about how VMX allows NMIs
where SVM did not somewhere around (A) -- or something like that,
earlier in this thread.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists