linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 15/18] Documentation: kunit: add documentation for KUnit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 May 2019 12:16:23 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc:     frowand.list@...il.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        keescook@...gle.com, kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com,
        mcgrof@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, sboyd@...nel.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, tytso@....edu, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
        Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com, Tim.Bird@...y.com,
        amir73il@...il.com, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, daniel@...ll.ch, jdike@...toit.com,
        joel@....id.au, julia.lawall@...6.fr, khilman@...libre.com,
        knut.omang@...cle.com, logang@...tatee.com, mpe@...erman.id.au,
        pmladek@...e.com, rdunlap@...radead.org, richard@....at,
        rientjes@...gle.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, wfg@...ux.intel.com,
        Felix Guo <felixguoxiuping@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 15/18] Documentation: kunit: add documentation for
 KUnit

On Tue, 14 May 2019 11:08:10 -0700
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com> wrote:

> > Naturally, though, I have one request: I'd rather not see this at the top
> > level, which is more than crowded enough as it is.  Can this material
> > please go into the development tools book, alongside the kselftest
> > documentation?  
> 
> Oh yeah, that seems like the obvious home for this in hindsight. Sorry
> about that. Will fix in next revision!

No need to apologize - I have to say the same thing to everybody :)

Thanks,

jon