linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.4 220/266] x86/speculation: Split out TIF update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190515090730.435582035@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 15 May 2019 12:55:27 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey.schaufler@...el.com>,
        Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
        Waiman Long <longman9394@...il.com>,
        Dave Stewart <david.c.stewart@...el.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 220/266] x86/speculation: Split out TIF update

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

commit e6da8bb6f9abb2628381904b24163c770e630bac upstream.

The update of the TIF_SSBD flag and the conditional speculation control MSR
update is done in the ssb_prctl_set() function directly. The upcoming prctl
support for controlling indirect branch speculation via STIBP needs the
same mechanism.

Split the code out and make it reusable. Reword the comment about updates
for other tasks.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey.schaufler@...el.com>
Cc: Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman9394@...il.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Dave Stewart <david.c.stewart@...el.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181125185005.652305076@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
@@ -697,10 +697,29 @@ static void ssb_select_mitigation(void)
 #undef pr_fmt
 #define pr_fmt(fmt)     "Speculation prctl: " fmt
 
-static int ssb_prctl_set(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long ctrl)
+static void task_update_spec_tif(struct task_struct *tsk, int tifbit, bool on)
 {
 	bool update;
 
+	if (on)
+		update = !test_and_set_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, tifbit);
+	else
+		update = test_and_clear_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, tifbit);
+
+	/*
+	 * Immediately update the speculation control MSRs for the current
+	 * task, but for a non-current task delay setting the CPU
+	 * mitigation until it is scheduled next.
+	 *
+	 * This can only happen for SECCOMP mitigation. For PRCTL it's
+	 * always the current task.
+	 */
+	if (tsk == current && update)
+		speculation_ctrl_update_current();
+}
+
+static int ssb_prctl_set(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long ctrl)
+{
 	if (ssb_mode != SPEC_STORE_BYPASS_PRCTL &&
 	    ssb_mode != SPEC_STORE_BYPASS_SECCOMP)
 		return -ENXIO;
@@ -711,28 +730,20 @@ static int ssb_prctl_set(struct task_str
 		if (task_spec_ssb_force_disable(task))
 			return -EPERM;
 		task_clear_spec_ssb_disable(task);
-		update = test_and_clear_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_SSBD);
+		task_update_spec_tif(task, TIF_SSBD, false);
 		break;
 	case PR_SPEC_DISABLE:
 		task_set_spec_ssb_disable(task);
-		update = !test_and_set_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_SSBD);
+		task_update_spec_tif(task, TIF_SSBD, true);
 		break;
 	case PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE:
 		task_set_spec_ssb_disable(task);
 		task_set_spec_ssb_force_disable(task);
-		update = !test_and_set_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_SSBD);
+		task_update_spec_tif(task, TIF_SSBD, true);
 		break;
 	default:
 		return -ERANGE;
 	}
-
-	/*
-	 * If being set on non-current task, delay setting the CPU
-	 * mitigation until it is next scheduled.
-	 */
-	if (task == current && update)
-		speculation_ctrl_update_current();
-
 	return 0;
 }