linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] firmware: bcm47xx_nvram: Correct size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2269a105-5338-14cf-025f-5764cedcd9b8@amsat.org>
Date:   Wed, 15 May 2019 07:17:03 +0200
From:   Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@...at.org>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org
Cc:     joe@...ches.com,
        Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
        "open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] firmware: bcm47xx_nvram: Correct size_t printf
 format

Hi Florian,

On 5/14/19 7:38 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> When building on a 64-bit host, we will get warnings like those:
> 
> drivers/firmware/broadcom/bcm47xx_nvram.c:103:3: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_err'
>    pr_err("nvram on flash (%i bytes) is bigger than the reserved space in memory, will just copy the first %i bytes\n",
>    ^~~~~~
> drivers/firmware/broadcom/bcm47xx_nvram.c:103:28: note: format string is defined here
>    pr_err("nvram on flash (%i bytes) is bigger than the reserved space in memory, will just copy the first %i bytes\n",
>                            ~^
>                            %li
> 
> Use %zu instead for that purpose.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Use %zu instead of %zi (Joe Perches)
> 
>  drivers/firmware/broadcom/bcm47xx_nvram.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/broadcom/bcm47xx_nvram.c b/drivers/firmware/broadcom/bcm47xx_nvram.c
> index d25f080fcb0d..8698c5dd29d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/broadcom/bcm47xx_nvram.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/broadcom/bcm47xx_nvram.c
> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static int nvram_find_and_copy(void __iomem *iobase, u32 lim)
>  		nvram_len = size;
>  	}
>  	if (nvram_len >= NVRAM_SPACE) {
> -		pr_err("nvram on flash (%i bytes) is bigger than the reserved space in memory, will just copy the first %i bytes\n",
> +		pr_err("nvram on flash (%zu bytes) is bigger than the reserved space in memory, will just copy the first %i bytes\n",
>  		       nvram_len, NVRAM_SPACE - 1);

Why not change the other format too, to stay consistent?

>  		nvram_len = NVRAM_SPACE - 1;
>  	}
> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static int nvram_init(void)
>  	    header.len > sizeof(header)) {
>  		nvram_len = header.len;
>  		if (nvram_len >= NVRAM_SPACE) {
> -			pr_err("nvram on flash (%i bytes) is bigger than the reserved space in memory, will just copy the first %i bytes\n",
> +			pr_err("nvram on flash (%zu bytes) is bigger than the reserved space in memory, will just copy the first %i bytes\n",
>  				header.len, NVRAM_SPACE);

Ditto.

Regardless:
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@...at.org>

>  			nvram_len = NVRAM_SPACE - 1;
>  		}
>