[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20b242a6-23a8-9b48-5cfe-c99df809dd24@web.de>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 07:35:59 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Wen Yang <wen.yang99@....com.cn>,
Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yi Wang <wang.yi59@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [2/3] Coccinelle: pci_free_consistent: Reduce a bit of duplicate
SmPL code
>> A return statement was specified with a known value for three branches
>> of a SmPL disjunction.
>> Reduce duplicate SmPL code there by using another disjunction for
>> these return values.
…
> NACK. The goak is not to squeeze the most information into the fewest
> number of characters.
Can you accept any other formatting for the adjusted SmPL code?
> The rule was fine as it was.
Can different run time characteristics become relevant here?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists