[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3e2cf31d-25af-e7c3-b308-62f64d650974@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 23:32:24 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Monitor change of console loglevel.
On 2019/05/14 18:19, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (05/11/19 00:19), Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>> We are seeing syzbot reports [1] where printk() messages prior to panic()
>> are missing for unknown reason. To test whether it is due to some testcase
>> changing console loglevel, let's panic() as soon as console loglevel has
>> changed. This patch is intended for testing on linux-next.git only, and
>> will be removed after we found what is wrong.
>
> Clone linux-next, apply the patch, push to a github/gitlab repo,
> configure syzbot to pull from github/gitlab?
I think that it is practically impossible to do so from the point of
view of automation.
> Adding temp patches
> to linux-next is hard and apparently not exactly what linux-next
> is used for these days.
Currently Andrew Morton is carrying "linux-next.git only" patches
(a.k.a. CONFIG_DEBUG_AID_FOR_SYZBOT patches) via mmotm tree.
It would be nice if linux-next.git can directly import temp patches
using "quilt push -a" on patches from a subversion repository. Then,
we can casually add/remove/update temp patches like this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists