[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190515143857.GB18892@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 16:38:58 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Cc: jannh@...gle.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arnd@...db.de, dhowells@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
cyphar@...har.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
elena.reshetova@...el.com, keescook@...omium.org,
luto@...capital.net, luto@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pid: add pidfd_open()
On 05/15, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> +SYSCALL_DEFINE2(pidfd_open, pid_t, pid, unsigned int, flags)
> +{
> + int fd, ret;
> + struct pid *p;
> + struct task_struct *tsk;
> +
> + if (flags)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (pid <= 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + p = find_get_pid(pid);
> + if (!p)
> + return -ESRCH;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + tsk = pid_task(p, PIDTYPE_PID);
You do not need find_get_pid() before rcu_lock and put_pid() at the end.
You can just do find_vpid() under rcu_read_lock().
> + if (!tsk)
> + ret = -ESRCH;
> + else if (unlikely(!thread_group_leader(tsk)))
> + ret = -EINVAL;
it seems that you can do a single check
tsk = pid_task(p, PIDTYPE_TGID);
if (!tsk)
ret = -ESRCH;
this even looks more correct if we race with exec changing the leader.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists