[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190515153041.cshzaj7xhf2p4zv7@brauner.io>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 17:30:42 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: jannh@...gle.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arnd@...db.de, dhowells@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
cyphar@...har.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
elena.reshetova@...el.com, keescook@...omium.org,
luto@...capital.net, luto@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pid: add pidfd_open()
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 05:19:13PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 05/15, Christian Brauner wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 04:38:58PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > >
> > > it seems that you can do a single check
> > >
> > > tsk = pid_task(p, PIDTYPE_TGID);
> > > if (!tsk)
> > > ret = -ESRCH;
> > >
> > > this even looks more correct if we race with exec changing the leader.
> >
> > The logic here being that you can only reach the thread_group leader
> > from struct pid if PIDTYPE_PID == PIDTYPE_TGID for this struct pid?
>
> Not exactly... it is not that PIDTYPE_PID == PIDTYPE_TGID for this pid,
> struct pid has no "type" or something like this.
>
> The logic is that pid->tasks[PIDTYPE_XXX] is the list of task which use
> this pid as "XXX" type.
>
> For example, clone(CLONE_THREAD) creates a pid which has a single non-
> empty list, pid->tasks[PIDTYPE_PID]. This pid can't be used as TGID or
> SID.
>
> So if pid_task(PIDTYPE_TGID) returns non-NULL we know that this pid was
> used for a group-leader, see copy_process() which does
Ah, this was what I was asking myself when I worked on thread-specific
signal sending. This clarifies quite a lot of things!
Though I wonder how one reliably gets a the PGID or SID from a
PIDTYPE_PID.
>
> if (thread_group_leader(p))
> attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_TGID);
>
>
> If we race with exec which changes the leader pid_task(TGID) can return
> the old leader. We do not care, but this means that we should not check
> thread_group_leader().
Nice!
Thank you, Oleg! :)
Christian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists