[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1905150811010.2591@hadrien>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 08:11:19 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
cc: Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Wen Yang <wen.yang99@....com.cn>,
Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yi Wang <wang.yi59@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [2/3] Coccinelle: pci_free_consistent: Reduce a bit of duplicate
SmPL code
On Wed, 15 May 2019, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> A return statement was specified with a known value for three branches
> >> of a SmPL disjunction.
> >> Reduce duplicate SmPL code there by using another disjunction for
> >> these return values.
> …
> > NACK. The goak is not to squeeze the most information into the fewest
> > number of characters.
>
> Can you accept any other formatting for the adjusted SmPL code?
No. It's fine as is.
>
>
> > The rule was fine as it was.
>
> Can different run time characteristics become relevant here?
No.
julia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists