linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 28/30] fuse: Reschedule dax free work if too many EAGAIN attempts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190515192715.18000-29-vgoyal@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 May 2019 15:27:13 -0400
From:   Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org
Cc:     vgoyal@...hat.com, miklos@...redi.hu, stefanha@...hat.com,
        dgilbert@...hat.com, swhiteho@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 28/30] fuse: Reschedule dax free work if too many EAGAIN attempts

fuse_dax_free_memory() can be very cpu intensive in corner cases. For example,
if one inode has consumed all the memory and a setupmapping request is
pending, that means inode lock is held by request and worker thread will
not get lock for a while. And given there is only one inode consuming all
the dax ranges, all the attempts to acquire lock will fail.

So if there are too many inode lock failures (-EAGAIN), reschedule the
worker with a 10ms delay.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
---
 fs/fuse/file.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
index b0293a308b5e..9b82d9b4ebc3 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/file.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
@@ -4047,7 +4047,7 @@ int fuse_dax_free_one_mapping(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct inode *inode,
 int fuse_dax_free_memory(struct fuse_conn *fc, unsigned long nr_to_free)
 {
 	struct fuse_dax_mapping *dmap, *pos, *temp;
-	int ret, nr_freed = 0;
+	int ret, nr_freed = 0, nr_eagain = 0;
 	u64 dmap_start = 0, window_offset = 0;
 	struct inode *inode = NULL;
 
@@ -4056,6 +4056,12 @@ int fuse_dax_free_memory(struct fuse_conn *fc, unsigned long nr_to_free)
 		if (nr_freed >= nr_to_free)
 			break;
 
+		if (nr_eagain > 20) {
+			queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq, &fc->dax_free_work,
+						msecs_to_jiffies(10));
+			return 0;
+		}
+
 		dmap = NULL;
 		spin_lock(&fc->lock);
 
@@ -4093,8 +4099,10 @@ int fuse_dax_free_memory(struct fuse_conn *fc, unsigned long nr_to_free)
 		}
 
 		/* Could not get inode lock. Try next element */
-		if (ret == -EAGAIN)
+		if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
+			nr_eagain++;
 			continue;
+		}
 		nr_freed++;
 	}
 	return 0;
-- 
2.20.1