[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=Vgiej=+hCZ_Eekoa4FJfpKxhOge8Wy29EEmtjB8JeF9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 14:50:09 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-cheza: Re-add reserved memory
Hi,
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 9:10 PM Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org> wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 3:48 PM Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:44 AM Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> > >
> > > Let's fixup the reserved memory to re-add the things we deleted in
> > > ("CHROMIUM: arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-cheza: Temporarily delete
> > > reserved-mem changes") in a way that plays nicely with the new
> > > upstream definitions.
> >
> > The message above makes no sense since that commit you reference isn't
> > in upstream.
> >
> > ...but in any case, why not squash this in with the previous commit?
>
> Yeah, I should have mentioned this was my intention, I just left it
> unsquashed since (at the time) it was something I had cherry-picked on
> top of current 4.19 cros kernel..
>
> anyways, I pushed an (unsquashed, converted to fixup!'s) update to:
>
> https://github.com/freedreno/kernel-msm/commits/wip/cheza-dtb-upstreaming
>
> which has updates based on you're review comments (at least assuming I
> understood them correctly).. plus some unrelated to cheza-dt patches
> on top to get things actually working (ie. ignore everything on top of
> the fixup!'s)
Looks OK to me. Are you going to post this? Bjorn / Andy: do you
guys have opinions here?
> I didn't see any comments on the 'delete zap-shader' patch, so
> hopefully that means what I did there was a sane (or at least not
> insane) way to handle android/linux tz vs what we have on cheza?
I wasn't CCed, so I assumed you were looking for feedback from others
on that one. ;-) Oh, but I guess Jordan and Bjorn also weren't
CCed... In any case, I replied now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists