lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 15 May 2019 14:50:09 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
Cc:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-cheza: Re-add reserved memory

Hi,

On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 9:10 PM Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org> wrote:

> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 3:48 PM Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:44 AM Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> > >
> > > Let's fixup the reserved memory to re-add the things we deleted in
> > > ("CHROMIUM: arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-cheza: Temporarily delete
> > > reserved-mem changes") in a way that plays nicely with the new
> > > upstream definitions.
> >
> > The message above makes no sense since that commit you reference isn't
> > in upstream.
> >
> > ...but in any case, why not squash this in with the previous commit?
>
> Yeah, I should have mentioned this was my intention, I just left it
> unsquashed since (at the time) it was something I had cherry-picked on
> top of current 4.19 cros kernel..
>
> anyways, I pushed an (unsquashed, converted to fixup!'s) update to:
>
> https://github.com/freedreno/kernel-msm/commits/wip/cheza-dtb-upstreaming
>
> which has updates based on you're review comments (at least assuming I
> understood them correctly).. plus some unrelated to cheza-dt patches
> on top to get things actually working (ie. ignore everything on top of
> the fixup!'s)

Looks OK to me.  Are you going to post this?  Bjorn / Andy: do you
guys have opinions here?


> I didn't see any comments on the 'delete zap-shader' patch, so
> hopefully that means what I did there was a sane (or at least not
> insane) way to handle android/linux tz vs what we have on cheza?

I wasn't CCed, so I assumed you were looking for feedback from others
on that one.  ;-)  Oh, but I guess Jordan and Bjorn also weren't
CCed...  In any case, I replied now.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ