[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190515231923.GA193527@google.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 16:19:23 -0700
From: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To: shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Tim Bird <tbird20d@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Carpenter,Dan" <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>, willy@...radead.org,
gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, knut.omang@...cle.com
Subject: Re: Linux Testing Microconference at LPC
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 04:44:19PM -0600, shuah wrote:
> Hi Sasha and Dhaval,
>
> On 4/11/19 11:37 AM, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > This is a call for participation for the Linux Testing microconference
> > at LPC this year.
> >
> > For those who were at LPC last year, as the closing panel mentioned,
> > testing is probably the next big push needed to improve quality. From
> > getting more selftests in, to regression testing to ensure we don't
> > break realtime as more of PREEMPT_RT comes in, to more stable distros,
> > we need more testing around the kernel.
> >
> > We have talked about different efforts around testing, such as fuzzing
> > (using syzkaller and trinity), automating fuzzing with syzbot, 0day
> > testing, test frameworks such as ktests, smatch to find bugs in the
> > past. We want to push this discussion further this year and are
> > interested in hearing from you what you want to talk about, and where
> > kernel testing needs to go next.
> >
> > Please let us know what topics you believe should be a part of the
> > micro conference this year.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Sasha and Dhaval
> >
>
> A talk on KUnit from Brendan Higgins will be good addition to this
> Micro-conference. I am cc'ing Brendan on this thread.
>
> Please consider adding it.
Thanks Shuah!
Presumably I should still submit the talk on the website (however, it
looks like the Testing Microconference isn't available as a track option
yet...)? Or is it okay if I just post the proposal here?
Also, for the framing of the talk (assuming people are indeed
interested). I figure people will want an intro along with some
background context, and a discussion of future work. Nevertheless, would
people like more of a demo talk or more of an audience driven discussion
on where we should go and what we should do? Or something else? Really,
I am open to talk about whatever everyone else wants.
For context on KUnit, you can read the LWN article about it here[1], or
you can see the current version of the patchset here[2].
Thanks!
[1] https://lwn.net/Articles/780985/
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/14/834
Powered by blists - more mailing lists