[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1794c3af-cec4-8b28-a299-400b857f0644@web.de>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 09:02:22 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Wen Yang <wen.yang99@....com.cn>,
Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yi Wang <wang.yi59@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [2/3] Coccinelle: pci_free_consistent: Reduce a bit of duplicate
SmPL code
>> Can different run time characteristics become relevant here?
>
> Internally, they should be identical.
I got other imaginations in this area.
I assume that the evaluation of a separate SmPL disjunction
for the shown return values is occasionally nicer than
the repeated matching for the corresponding complete statement.
It might be that the possible run time difference will not be
big enough for you.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists