[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c143337b-a28c-4a63-f22a-421c283969d0@web.de>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 10:06:52 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@....com.cn>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Yi Wang <wang.yi59@....com.cn>,
Cheng Shengyu <cheng.shengyu@....com.cn>,
Ma Jiang <ma.jiang@....com.cn>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [3/3] Coccinelle: pci_free_consistent: Extend when constraints
for two SmPL ellipses
> I don't think it is an environmental issue.
You are right about taking other parameters better into account.
> Theoretically, the original SmPL should find bugs.
I expect also that both script versions should display a warning.
> Although, I still send you my environmental information:
Thanks.
> spatch version 1.0.7 compiled with OCaml version 4.06.0
This shows that our software variants are recent enough.
> You may not take a serious look at the pci_free_consistent.cocci script,
I try to handle my update suggestions and your constructive feedback seriously.
> it needs to pass in the virtual variable report.
I did that a moment later.
I would like to apologise for a temporarily inappropriate parameter selection.
How will the clarification of the shown software behaviour evolve further?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists