linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: fix protection of mm_struct fields in get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f0978f70-716c-0272-d8f0-87dc163d0784@virtuozzo.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 May 2019 11:38:18 +0300
From:   Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
To:     Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, mkoutny@...e.com,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix protection of mm_struct fields in get_cmdline()

Hi, Konstantin,

On 15.05.2019 11:15, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> Since commit 88aa7cc688d4 ("mm: introduce arg_lock to protect arg_start|
> end and env_start|end in mm_struct") related mm fields are protected with
> separate spinlock and mmap_sem held for read is not enough for protection.
> 
> Fixes: 88aa7cc688d4 ("mm: introduce arg_lock to protect arg_start|end and env_start|end in mm_struct")
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>

is this already fixed in Michal's series: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/2/422 ?

Thanks,
Kirill

> ---
>  mm/util.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
> index e2e4f8c3fa12..540e7c157cf2 100644
> --- a/mm/util.c
> +++ b/mm/util.c
> @@ -717,12 +717,12 @@ int get_cmdline(struct task_struct *task, char *buffer, int buflen)
>  	if (!mm->arg_end)
>  		goto out_mm;	/* Shh! No looking before we're done */
>  
> -	down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> +	spin_lock(&mm->arg_lock);
>  	arg_start = mm->arg_start;
>  	arg_end = mm->arg_end;
>  	env_start = mm->env_start;
>  	env_end = mm->env_end;
> -	up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> +	spin_unlock(&mm->arg_lock);
>  
>  	len = arg_end - arg_start;
>  
>