lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190515104431.5e353729@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 15 May 2019 10:44:31 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Gal Pressman <galpress@...zon.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
        Talel Shenhar <talel@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the thermal-soc tree with Linus'
 tree

Hi Eduardo,

On Tue, 14 May 2019 07:15:33 -0700 Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 02:40:06PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Eduardo,
> > 
> > On Mon, 13 May 2019 20:44:11 -0700 Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com> wrote:  
> > >
> > > Thanks for spotting this. I am re-doing the branch based off v5.1-rc7,
> > > where the last conflict went in with my current queue.  
> > 
> > Its really not worth the rebase.  Just fix the build problem and send it
> > all to Linus.  
> 
> Yeah, I think I was not super clear in my first email. I am about to
> send the content of my branch to Linus.  This specific conflict was
> because a change in MAINTAINERS went in before the change I have in it,
> causing a conflict there. The rebase is simply to make it easier for him
> to pull when I send the git pull.

Linus has repeated told people not to do that.  He wants to see the
conflicts.  You should mention any conflicts you know about in your pull
request - just as a heads up to him.

However, if a conflict is particularly tricky, it may be worth while to
a test merge in another branch and tell him about that other branch in
your pull request.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ