linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.0 136/137] PCI: hv: Add pci_destroy_slot() in pci_devices_present

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190515090703.727867468@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 15 May 2019 12:56:57 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.0 136/137] PCI: hv: Add pci_destroy_slot() in pci_devices_present_work(), if necessary

From: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>

commit 340d455699400f2c2c0f9b3f703ade3085cdb501 upstream.

When we hot-remove a device, usually the host sends us a PCI_EJECT message,
and a PCI_BUS_RELATIONS message with bus_rel->device_count == 0.

When we execute the quick hot-add/hot-remove test, the host may not send
us the PCI_EJECT message if the guest has not fully finished the
initialization by sending the PCI_RESOURCES_ASSIGNED* message to the
host, so it's potentially unsafe to only depend on the
pci_destroy_slot() in hv_eject_device_work() because the code path

create_root_hv_pci_bus()
 -> hv_pci_assign_slots()

is not called in this case. Note: in this case, the host still sends the
guest a PCI_BUS_RELATIONS message with bus_rel->device_count == 0.

In the quick hot-add/hot-remove test, we can have such a race before
the code path

pci_devices_present_work()
 -> new_pcichild_device()

adds the new device into the hbus->children list, we may have already
received the PCI_EJECT message, and since the tasklet handler

hv_pci_onchannelcallback()

may fail to find the "hpdev" by calling

get_pcichild_wslot(hbus, dev_message->wslot.slot)

hv_pci_eject_device() is not called; Later, by continuing execution

create_root_hv_pci_bus()
 -> hv_pci_assign_slots()

creates the slot and the PCI_BUS_RELATIONS message with
bus_rel->device_count == 0 removes the device from hbus->children, and
we end up being unable to remove the slot in

hv_pci_remove()
 -> hv_pci_remove_slots()

Remove the slot in pci_devices_present_work() when the device
is removed to address this race.

pci_devices_present_work() and hv_eject_device_work() run in the
singled-threaded hbus->wq, so there is not a double-remove issue for the
slot.

We cannot offload hv_pci_eject_device() from hv_pci_onchannelcallback()
to the workqueue, because we need the hv_pci_onchannelcallback()
synchronously call hv_pci_eject_device() to poll the channel
ringbuffer to work around the "hangs in hv_compose_msi_msg()" issue
fixed in commit de0aa7b2f97d ("PCI: hv: Fix 2 hang issues in
hv_compose_msi_msg()")

Fixes: a15f2c08c708 ("PCI: hv: support reporting serial number as slot information")
Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
[lorenzo.pieralisi@....com: rewritten commit log]
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Reviewed-by:  Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
@@ -1781,6 +1781,10 @@ static void pci_devices_present_work(str
 		hpdev = list_first_entry(&removed, struct hv_pci_dev,
 					 list_entry);
 		list_del(&hpdev->list_entry);
+
+		if (hpdev->pci_slot)
+			pci_destroy_slot(hpdev->pci_slot);
+
 		put_pcichild(hpdev);
 	}