[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190515090701.087242540@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 12:56:25 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Xiao Ni <xni@...hat.com>,
David Jeffery <djeffery@...hat.com>,
Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@...hat.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 5.0 104/137] Dont jump to compute_result state from check_result state
From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@...hat.com>
commit 4f4fd7c5798bbdd5a03a60f6269cf1177fbd11ef upstream.
Changing state from check_state_check_result to
check_state_compute_result not only is unsafe but also doesn't
appear to serve a valid purpose. A raid6 check should only be
pushing out extra writes if doing repair and a mis-match occurs.
The stripe dev management will already try and do repair writes
for failing sectors.
This patch makes the raid6 check_state_check_result handling
work more like raid5's. If somehow too many failures for a
check, just quit the check operation for the stripe. When any
checks pass, don't try and use check_state_compute_result for
a purpose it isn't needed for and is unsafe for. Just mark the
stripe as in sync for passing its parity checks and let the
stripe dev read/write code and the bad blocks list do their
job handling I/O errors.
Repro steps from Xiao:
These are the steps to reproduce this problem:
1. redefined OPT_MEDIUM_ERR_ADDR to 12000 in scsi_debug.c
2. insmod scsi_debug.ko dev_size_mb=11000 max_luns=1 num_tgts=1
3. mdadm --create /dev/md127 --level=6 --raid-devices=5 /dev/sde1 /dev/sde2 /dev/sde3 /dev/sde5 /dev/sde6
sde is the disk created by scsi_debug
4. echo "2" >/sys/module/scsi_debug/parameters/opts
5. raid-check
It panic:
[ 4854.730899] md: data-check of RAID array md127
[ 4854.857455] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#80 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
[ 4854.859246] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#80 Sense Key : Medium Error [current]
[ 4854.860694] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#80 Add. Sense: Unrecovered read error
[ 4854.862207] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#80 CDB: Read(10) 28 00 00 00 2d 88 00 04 00 00
[ 4854.864196] print_req_error: critical medium error, dev sdr, sector 11656 flags 0
[ 4854.867409] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#100 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
[ 4854.869469] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#100 Sense Key : Medium Error [current]
[ 4854.871206] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#100 Add. Sense: Unrecovered read error
[ 4854.872858] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#100 CDB: Read(10) 28 00 00 00 2e e0 00 00 08 00
[ 4854.874587] print_req_error: critical medium error, dev sdr, sector 12000 flags 4000
[ 4854.876456] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#101 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
[ 4854.878552] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#101 Sense Key : Medium Error [current]
[ 4854.880278] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#101 Add. Sense: Unrecovered read error
[ 4854.881846] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#101 CDB: Read(10) 28 00 00 00 2e e8 00 00 08 00
[ 4854.883691] print_req_error: critical medium error, dev sdr, sector 12008 flags 4000
[ 4854.893927] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#166 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
[ 4854.896002] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#166 Sense Key : Medium Error [current]
[ 4854.897561] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#166 Add. Sense: Unrecovered read error
[ 4854.899110] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#166 CDB: Read(10) 28 00 00 00 2e e0 00 00 10 00
[ 4854.900989] print_req_error: critical medium error, dev sdr, sector 12000 flags 0
[ 4854.902757] md/raid:md127: read error NOT corrected!! (sector 9952 on sdr1).
[ 4854.904375] md/raid:md127: read error NOT corrected!! (sector 9960 on sdr1).
[ 4854.906201] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 4854.907341] kernel BUG at drivers/md/raid5.c:4190!
raid5.c:4190 above is this BUG_ON:
handle_parity_checks6()
...
BUG_ON(s->uptodate < disks - 1); /* We don't need Q to recover */
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v3.16+
OriginalAuthor: David Jeffery <djeffery@...hat.com>
Cc: Xiao Ni <xni@...hat.com>
Tested-by: David Jeffery <djeffery@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Jeffy <djeffery@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 19 ++++---------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -4233,26 +4233,15 @@ static void handle_parity_checks6(struct
case check_state_check_result:
sh->check_state = check_state_idle;
+ if (s->failed > 1)
+ break;
/* handle a successful check operation, if parity is correct
* we are done. Otherwise update the mismatch count and repair
* parity if !MD_RECOVERY_CHECK
*/
if (sh->ops.zero_sum_result == 0) {
- /* both parities are correct */
- if (!s->failed)
- set_bit(STRIPE_INSYNC, &sh->state);
- else {
- /* in contrast to the raid5 case we can validate
- * parity, but still have a failure to write
- * back
- */
- sh->check_state = check_state_compute_result;
- /* Returning at this point means that we may go
- * off and bring p and/or q uptodate again so
- * we make sure to check zero_sum_result again
- * to verify if p or q need writeback
- */
- }
+ /* Any parity checked was correct */
+ set_bit(STRIPE_INSYNC, &sh->state);
} else {
atomic64_add(STRIPE_SECTORS, &conf->mddev->resync_mismatches);
if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_CHECK, &conf->mddev->recovery)) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists