[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190516051921.GC21366@rapoport-lnx>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 08:19:21 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] remove ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL where it has no
effect
Andrew,
Can this go via the -mm tree?
On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 10:56:14PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For several architectures the ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL has no real effect
> because the dependencies for the memory model are always evaluated to a
> single value.
>
> Remove the ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL from the Kconfigs for these
> architectures.
>
> Mike Rapoport (3):
> arm: remove ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL
> s390: remove ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL
> sparc: remove ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL
>
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 3 ---
> arch/s390/Kconfig | 3 ---
> arch/sparc/Kconfig | 3 ---
> 3 files changed, 9 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists