[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <76B41175-0CEE-466C-91BF-89A1CA857061@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 19:55:16 +0000
From: "Nikunj Kela (nkela)" <nkela@...co.com>
To: "jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
CC: "xe-linux-external(mailer list)" <xe-linux-external@...co.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] igb: add parameter to ignore nvm checksum validation
On 5/16/19, 12:35 PM, "Jeff Kirsher" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com> wrote:
On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 23:14 +0000, Nikunj Kela wrote:
>> Some of the broken NICs don't have EEPROM programmed correctly. It
>> results
>> in probe to fail. This change adds a module parameter that can be
>> used to
>> ignore nvm checksum validation.
>>
>> Cc: xe-linux-external@...co.com
>> Signed-off-by: Nikunj Kela <nkela@...co.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 28
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>NAK for two reasons. First, module parameters are not desirable
>because their individual to one driver and a global solution should be
>found so that all networking device drivers can use the solution. This
>will keep the interface to change/setup/modify networking drivers
>consistent for all drivers.
>Second and more importantly, if your NIC is broken, fix it. Do not try
>and create a software workaround so that you can continue to use a
>broken NIC. There are methods/tools available to properly reprogram
>the EEPROM on a NIC, which is the right solution for your issue.
I am proposing this as a debug parameter. Obviously, we need to fix EEPROM but this helps us continuing the development while manufacturing fixes NIC.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists