[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190516080015.16033-13-duyuyang@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 16:00:10 +0800
From: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@...il.com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, will.deacon@....com, mingo@...nel.org
Cc: bvanassche@....org, ming.lei@...hat.com, frederic@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, boqun.feng@...il.com, paulmck@...ux.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yuyang Du <duyuyang@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 12/17] locking/lockdep: Remove useless lock type assignment
Next lock to acquire has the lock type set already. There is no need to
reassign it when it is recursive read. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@...il.com>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index d5a874b..ce79b5a 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -3132,13 +3132,6 @@ static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr,
if (!ret)
return 0;
/*
- * Mark recursive read, as we jump over it when
- * building dependencies (just like we jump over
- * trylock entries):
- */
- if (ret == LOCK_TYPE_RECURSIVE)
- hlock->read = LOCK_TYPE_RECURSIVE;
- /*
* Add dependency only if this lock is not the head
* of the chain, and if it's not a secondary read-lock:
*/
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists