[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM0PR04MB4211EF0D257E502C3BF917D0800A0@AM0PR04MB4211.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 10:39:34 +0000
From: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>
To: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"rui.zhang@...el.com" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"edubezval@...il.com" <edubezval@...il.com>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"ulf.hansson@...aro.org" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
"heiko@...ech.de" <heiko@...ech.de>,
"horms+renesas@...ge.net.au" <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>,
"agross@...nel.org" <agross@...nel.org>,
"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
"bjorn.andersson@...aro.org" <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
"jagan@...rulasolutions.com" <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>,
"enric.balletbo@...labora.com" <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
"marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr" <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
CC: dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V12 3/5] thermal: imx_sc: add i.MX system controller
thermal support
[...]
> > > + if (!sensor)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > + ret = thermal_zone_of_get_sensor_id(child,
> > > + &sensor_specs,
> >
> > It looks a bit strange why need sensor_specs as you even did not use it.
>
> It is because parsing the phandle arguments needs it, such as the
> thermal_zone_of_sensor_register() function needs this pointer to be passed
> back to check the elements are valid or NOT, so the API does NOT define it as
> local structure. The API NOT just return the sensor id, but also the
> of_phandle_args address, although we do NOT need it at all here.
The main problem is this one introduced in 2/5 which needs get ack from maintainer.
For me, I would suggest to make sensor_specs transparent to user if
it's really not needed by users.
Please try to make it either optional or hide to core users as well.
And I guess the later one is doable after a glance at the core code.
Regards
Dong Aisheng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists