linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] pinctrl: mediatek: mt8183: Add support for wake sources

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZb73vNyepcfjzEGAopc7BBxde_N1wxn7PSJ3aGC0=Gig@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 May 2019 13:55:46 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
Cc:     "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chuanjia Liu <Chuanjia.Liu@...iatek.com>,
        Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] pinctrl: mediatek: mt8183: Add support for wake sources

On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 9:33 AM Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org> wrote:

> This adds support for wake sources in pinctrl-mtk-common-v2, and
> pinctrl-mt8183. Without this patch, all interrupts that are left
> enabled on suspend act as wake sources (and wake sources without
> interrupt enabled do not).
>
> Changes since v1:
>  - Move changes from mtk-common-v2 to mtk-pinctrl-paris, as
>    recommended by Sean, to keep better separation between eint
>    and pinctrl-common features.
>
> Nicolas Boichat (2):
>   pinctrl: mediatek: Add pm_ops to pinctrl-paris
>   pinctrl: mediatek: mt8183: Add mtk_pinctrl_paris_pm_ops

All seems to look fair to me, but I need some official ACK from
Sean on these.

I see there is some discussion on a related patch set which
also has two patches so I am a but confused how mature the
two patch sets are? Are they at all related?

Yours,
Linus Walleij