Message-ID: <20190516130813.i66ujfzftbgpqhnh@brauner.io>
Date:   Thu, 16 May 2019 15:08:15 +0200
From:   Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
To:     Daniel Colascione <dancol@...gle.com>
Cc:     Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        elena.reshetova@...el.com, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pid: add pidfd_open()

On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 10:45:06AM -0700, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 3:04 AM Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io> wrote:
> >
> > This adds the pidfd_open() syscall. It allows a caller to retrieve pollable
> > pidfds for a process which did not get created via CLONE_PIDFD, i.e. for a
> > process that is created via traditional fork()/clone() calls that is only
> > referenced by a PID:
> 
> Thanks for doing this work. I'm really looking forward to this new
> approach to process management.

Thanks! Glad to hear!

> 
> > int pidfd = pidfd_open(1234, 0);
> > ret = pidfd_send_signal(pidfd, SIGSTOP, NULL, 0);
> >
> > With the introduction of pidfds through CLONE_PIDFD it is possible to
> > created pidfds at process creation time.
> > However, a lot of processes get created with traditional PID-based calls
> > such as fork() or clone() (without CLONE_PIDFD). For these processes a
> > caller can currently not create a pollable pidfd. This is a huge problem
> > for Android's low memory killer (LMK) and service managers such as systemd.
> > Both are examples of tools that want to make use of pidfds to get reliable
> > notification of process exit for non-parents (pidfd polling) and race-free
> > signal sending (pidfd_send_signal()). They intend to switch to this API for
> > process supervision/management as soon as possible. Having no way to get
> > pollable pidfds from PID-only processes is one of the biggest blockers for
> > them in adopting this api. With pidfd_open() making it possible to retrieve
> > pidfd for PID-based processes we enable them to adopt this api.
> >
> > In line with Arnd's recent changes to consolidate syscall numbers across
> > architectures, I have added the pidfd_open() syscall to all architectures
> > at the same time.
> 
> I'm glad it's easier now.
> 
> >  arch/alpha/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl      |  1 +
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd32.h           |  2 +
> >  arch/ia64/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl       |  1 +
> >  arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl       |  1 +
> >  arch/microblaze/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl |  1 +
> >  arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_n32.tbl   |  1 +
> >  arch/parisc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl     |  1 +
> >  arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl    |  1 +
> >  arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl       |  1 +
> >  arch/sh/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl         |  1 +
> >  arch/sparc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl      |  1 +
> >  arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl      |  1 +
> >  arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl      |  1 +
> >  arch/xtensa/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl     |  1 +
> 
> It'd be nice to arrange the system call tables so that we need to
> change only one file when adding a new system call.
> 
> [Snip system call wiring]
> 
> > --- a/include/linux/pid.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pid.h
> > @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ struct pid
> >  extern struct pid init_struct_pid;
> >
> >  extern const struct file_operations pidfd_fops;
> > +extern int pidfd_create(struct pid *pid);
> >
> >  static inline struct pid *get_pid(struct pid *pid)
> >  {
> > diff --git a/include/linux/syscalls.h b/include/linux/syscalls.h
> > index e2870fe1be5b..989055e0b501 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/syscalls.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/syscalls.h
> > @@ -929,6 +929,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_clock_adjtime32(clockid_t which_clock,
> >                                 struct old_timex32 __user *tx);
> >  asmlinkage long sys_syncfs(int fd);
> >  asmlinkage long sys_setns(int fd, int nstype);
> > +asmlinkage long sys_pidfd_open(pid_t pid, unsigned int flags);
> >  asmlinkage long sys_sendmmsg(int fd, struct mmsghdr __user *msg,
> >                              unsigned int vlen, unsigned flags);
> >  asmlinkage long sys_process_vm_readv(pid_t pid,
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h b/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
> > index dee7292e1df6..94a257a93d20 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
> > @@ -832,9 +832,11 @@ __SYSCALL(__NR_io_uring_setup, sys_io_uring_setup)
> >  __SYSCALL(__NR_io_uring_enter, sys_io_uring_enter)
> >  #define __NR_io_uring_register 427
> >  __SYSCALL(__NR_io_uring_register, sys_io_uring_register)
> > +#define __NR_pidfd_open 428
> > +__SYSCALL(__NR_pidfd_open, sys_pidfd_open)
> >
> >  #undef __NR_syscalls
> > -#define __NR_syscalls 428
> > +#define __NR_syscalls 429
> >
> >  /*
> >   * 32 bit systems traditionally used different
> > diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> > index 737db1828437..980cc1d2b8d4 100644
> > --- a/kernel/fork.c
> > +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> > @@ -1714,7 +1714,7 @@ const struct file_operations pidfd_fops = {
> >   * Return: On success, a cloexec pidfd is returned.
> >   *         On error, a negative errno number will be returned.
> >   */
> > -static int pidfd_create(struct pid *pid)
> > +int pidfd_create(struct pid *pid)
> >  {
> >         int fd;
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c
> > index 20881598bdfa..237d18d6ecb8 100644
> > --- a/kernel/pid.c
> > +++ b/kernel/pid.c
> > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/syscalls.h>
> >  #include <linux/proc_ns.h>
> >  #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
> > +#include <linux/sched/signal.h>
> >  #include <linux/sched/task.h>
> >  #include <linux/idr.h>
> >
> > @@ -451,6 +452,53 @@ struct pid *find_ge_pid(int nr, struct pid_namespace *ns)
> >         return idr_get_next(&ns->idr, &nr);
> >  }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * pidfd_open() - Open new pid file descriptor.
> > + *
> > + * @pid:   pid for which to retrieve a pidfd
> > + * @flags: flags to pass
> > + *
> > + * This creates a new pid file descriptor with the O_CLOEXEC flag set for
> > + * the process identified by @pid. Currently, the process identified by
> > + * @pid must be a thread-group leader. This restriction currently exists
> > + * for all aspects of pidfds including pidfd creation (CLONE_PIDFD cannot
> > + * be used with CLONE_THREAD) and pidfd polling (only supports thread group
> > + * leaders).
> > + *
> > + * Return: On success, a cloexec pidfd is returned.
> > + *         On error, a negative errno number will be returned.
> > + */
> > +SYSCALL_DEFINE2(pidfd_open, pid_t, pid, unsigned int, flags)
> > +{
> > +       int fd, ret;
> > +       struct pid *p;
> > +       struct task_struct *tsk;
> > +
> > +       if (flags)
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> 
> If we support blocking operations on pidfds, we'll want to be able to
> put them in non-blocking mode. Does it make sense to accept and ignore
> O_NONBLOCK here now?

Hm, is there a race condition you see that would prevent you from using
fcntl()? If you're ok with using fcntl() I would argue we should hold on
tight to every bit we have for flags.

> 
> > +       if (pid <= 0)
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> 
> WDYT of defining pid == 0 to mean "open myself"?

I'm torn. It be a nice shortcut of course but pid being 0 is usually an
indicator for child processes. So unless the getpid() before
pidfd_open() is an issue I'd say let's leave it as is. If you really
want the shortcut might -1 be better?

> 
> > +       p = find_get_pid(pid);
> > +       if (!p)
> > +               return -ESRCH;
> > +
> > +       rcu_read_lock();
> > +       tsk = pid_task(p, PIDTYPE_PID);
> > +       if (!tsk)
> > +               ret = -ESRCH;
> > +       else if (unlikely(!thread_group_leader(tsk)))
> > +               ret = -EINVAL;
> > +       else
> > +               ret = 0;
> > +       rcu_read_unlock();
> > +
> > +       fd = ret ?: pidfd_create(p);
> > +       put_pid(p);
> > +       return fd;
> > +}

Powered by blists - more mailing lists