lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 16 May 2019 10:32:37 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To:     Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
Cc:     "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Jun Yao <yaojun8558363@...il.com>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: implement update_fdt_pgprot()

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 9:51 AM Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 10:37 PM Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > Why not just map the FDT R/W at the start and change it to RO just
> > before calling unflatten_device_tree? Then all the FDT scanning
> > functions or any future fixups we need can just assume R/W. That is
> > essentially what Stephen suggested. However, there's no need for a
> > weak function as it can all be done within the arch code.
> >
> We need to add a new seed for kexec

Doesn't kexec operate on a copy because it already does modifications.

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists